Neil Fraser

48 papers receiving 896 citations

Peers

Neil Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 656
  • Automotive Engineering 340
  • Computational Mechanics 376
  • Aerospace Engineering 204
  • Biomedical Engineering 201
Replace John T. Farrell with:
John T. Farrell United States
Anthony Giles United Kingdom
Klaus Mollenhauer Germany
John Stokes United States
Juwei Zhang China
David Gordon Canada
Onur Tunçer Türkiye
Steven P. Nichols United States
Lilis Yuliati Indonesia
Neil Fraser relative to John T. Farrell United States John T. Farrell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John T. Farrell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Fraser. The network helps show where Neil Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Neil Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010210
2 2009171
3 200973
4 200963
5 200846
6 201142
7 198935
8 200835
9 201131
10
Working poverty in Europe : a comparative approach
201129
11 201128
12 201025
13 201020
14 199719
15 200017
16 201016
17 199913
18 20079
19 20158
20 20096

About Neil Fraser

Neil Fraser is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Automotive Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Political Science and International Relations and Computational Mechanics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 976 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (18 papers), Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies (7 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (6 papers), Biodiesel Production and Applications (6 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (5 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (656 citations), Automotive Engineering (340 citations), Computational Mechanics (376 citations), Aerospace Engineering (204 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (201 citations). Neil Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hugh Blaxill, Grant Lumsden, Elisa Toulson, William P. Attard, Alasdair Cairns, James Taylor, Jonathan Hall, Richard Sykes, John Rogerson and Craig L. Goodfellow. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, SAE International Journal of Engines, MTZ - Motortechnische Zeitschrift, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering and Social Policy and Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact