Danielle Brimo

572 citations
16 papers · 407 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Brimo

16 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Danielle Brimo
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 373
  • Statistics and Probability 109
  • Education 201
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 87
  • Occupational Therapy 18
Replace Lauren A. Katz with:
Lauren A. Katz United States
Emily A. Diehm United States
Silke Fricke United Kingdom
Sana Tibi United States
Ae-Hwa Kim South Korea
Léa Lacerenza Canada
Joanne D. Meier United States
Melodee A. Walker United States
MJ Snowling
Keith T. Greaney New Zealand
Danielle Brimo relative to Lauren A. Katz United States Lauren A. Katz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Lauren A. Katz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Brimo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Brimo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Brimo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Brimo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Brimo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Brimo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Brimo. The network helps show where Danielle Brimo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Brimo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Brimo Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Brimo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2011122
2 201576
3 201353
4 201729
5 201125
6 201523
7 201820
8 201215
9 202310
10 20179
11 20138
12 20196
13 20135
14 20204
15 20221
16 20231

About Danielle Brimo

Danielle Brimo is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Occupational Therapy, Statistics and Probability and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (14 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (9 papers), Language Development and Disorders (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (373 citations), Statistics and Probability (109 citations), Education (201 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (87 citations) and Occupational Therapy (18 citations). Danielle Brimo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kenn Apel, Nancy Perrin, Emily A. Diehm, Emily Lund, Shurita Thomas-Tate, Christian Vorstius, LaVae M. Hoffman, Ralph Radach, Maria L. Muñoz and C. Melanie Schuele. Their work appears in journals such as Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, Reading and Writing, Scientific Studies of Reading, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders and Topics in Language Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact