Daniela Schulz

2.6k citations
58 papers · 2.0k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Schulz

55 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Daniela Schulz
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Biological Psychiatry 260
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 358
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 874
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 551
  • Developmental Neuroscience 66
Replace Elizabeth A. Heller with:
Elizabeth A. Heller United States
Dani Dumitriu United States
Sevilla D. Detera‐Wadleigh United States
B. Bogerts Germany
Kristen A. Keefe United States
Ana M.D. Carneiro United States
Helmut W. Kessels Netherlands
Stephen J. Sawiak United Kingdom
Bárbara Coimbra Portugal
Carina Soares‐Cunha Portugal
Daniela Schulz relative to Elizabeth A. Heller United States Elizabeth A. Heller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Elizabeth A. Heller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Schulz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Schulz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Schulz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Schulz. The network helps show where Daniela Schulz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Schulz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Schulz Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Schulz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011495
2 2002174
3 201199
4 200086
5 201180
6 201470
7 200665
8 201063
9 200258
10 201349
11 200049
12 200445
13 202244
14 200542
15 200741
16 202239
17 202036
18 200935
19 200935
20 200534

About Daniela Schulz

Daniela Schulz is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (15 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (14 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (11 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (7 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (4 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (260 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (358 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (874 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (551 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (66 citations). Daniela Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Fritz A. Henn, Martine M. Mirrione, Joseph P. Huston, Reşit Canbeyli, Christophe D. Proulx, Bo Li, Roberto Malinow, ChiHye Chung, Joaquín Piriz and Bianca Topic. Their work appears in journals such as Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Behavioural Brain Research, Cancers and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact