Bianca Topic

1.5k citations
32 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Bianca Topic

32 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Bianca Topic
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 146
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 523
  • Aging 24
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 233
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 80
Replace Caroline Kopp with:
Caroline Kopp Switzerland
Donald E. Clody United States
Susana Rubiales de Barioglio Argentina
Volker Korz Austria
Gregory M. Rose United States
Takeshi Izumi Japan
Valeria Paola Carlini Argentina
Patrice Venault France
Rüdiger U. Hasenöhrl Germany
Antônio Pedro de Mello Cruz Brazil
Bianca Topic relative to Caroline Kopp Switzerland Caroline Kopp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Caroline Kopp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bianca Topic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bianca Topic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bianca Topic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bianca Topic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bianca Topic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bianca Topic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bianca Topic. The network helps show where Bianca Topic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bianca Topic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bianca Topic Line = papers co-authored together Bianca Topic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013233
2 2008103
3 200275
4 200666
5 201654
6 201349
7 200947
8 200542
9 200441
10 200240
11 200640
12 200735
13 200935
14 200233
15 200931
16 200827
17 201127
18 200826
19 200724
20 200222

About Bianca Topic

Bianca Topic is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (17 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (2 papers) and Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (146 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (523 citations), Aging (24 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (233 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (80 citations). Bianca Topic has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Joseph P. Huston, J.P. Huston, Maria A. de Souza Silva, Claudia Mattern, Christian P. Müller, Tim Buddenberg, M.A. de Souza Silva, Daniela Schulz, Rüdiger U. Hasenöhrl and Ekrem Dere. Their work appears in journals such as Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Neuroscience, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Behavioural Brain Research and Neuropsychobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact