Daniel W. Sacks

1.4k citations
39 papers · 558 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health top 10%
    • Health disparities and outcomes

Papers in

Daniel W. Sacks

34 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers

Daniel W. Sacks
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Social Psychology 179
  • Health 74
  • Economics and Econometrics 236
  • Accounting 86
  • Gender Studies 62
Replace Vasileios Zikos with:
Vasileios Zikos Thailand
Damon Jones United States
Niels Westergaard‐Nielsen Denmark
Markus Hahn Australia
Tae‐Young Pak South Korea
Dusanee Kesavayuth Thailand
Máximo Rossi Uruguay
Tansel Yilmazer United States
Marco Bertoni Italy
María Prados United States
Daniel W. Sacks relative to Vasileios Zikos Thailand Vasileios Zikos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Vasileios Zikos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Sacks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Sacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Sacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Sacks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Sacks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Sacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Sacks. The network helps show where Daniel W. Sacks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Sacks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Sacks Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Sacks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012186
2 202044
3 201042
4 202034
5 202228
6 201025
7 202124
8 201718
9 201317
10 201317
11 201914
12 201410
13 202110
14 202010
15 20218
16 20208
17 20137
18 20236
19 20236
20 20186

About Daniel W. Sacks

Daniel W. Sacks is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, General Health Professions, Gender Studies and Demography, having authored 39 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (9 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (9 papers), Global Health Care Issues (7 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (7 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (179 citations), Health (74 citations), Economics and Econometrics (236 citations), Accounting (86 citations) and Gender Studies (62 citations). Daniel W. Sacks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Betsey Stevenson, Justin Wolfers, Alexander Gelber, Damon Jones, R. Andrew Butters, Kosali Simon, Thủy Nguyễn, Alex Hollingsworth, Coleman Drake and Haizhen Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Economics, The Journal of Human Resources, Health Economics, Journal of Health Economics and American Economic Journal Applied Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact