Daniel I. Rees

145 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Daniel I. Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Pharmacology 601
  • Gender Studies 369
  • General Health Professions 810
  • Safety Research 296
  • Health 235
Replace Michael Fendrich with:
Michael Fendrich United States
James D. Sargent United States
Joseph J. Sabia United States
Joel W. Grube United States
Bonnie Halpern‐Felsher United States
Alexander C. Wagenaar United States
James Nonnemaker United States
Mark Wolfson United States
Phyllis L. Ellickson United States
Ross Hömel Australia
Daniel I. Rees relative to Michael Fendrich United States Michael Fendrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Michael Fendrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel I. Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel I. Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel I. Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel I. Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel I. Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel I. Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel I. Rees. The network helps show where Daniel I. Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel I. Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel I. Rees Line = papers co-authored together Daniel I. Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 155 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013299
2 2011172
3 1996155
4 2009134
5 2002114
6 2015111
7 2010106
8 1996105
9 2017103
10 201486
11 200585
12 201381
13 200177
14 201476
15 200274
16 201974
17 199173
18 201971
19 200567
20 201864

About Daniel I. Rees

Daniel I. Rees is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Education and Epidemiology, having authored 155 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (16 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (12 papers), School Choice and Performance (11 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (9 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (601 citations), Gender Studies (369 citations), General Health Professions (810 citations), Safety Research (296 citations) and Health (235 citations). Daniel I. Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D. Mark Anderson, Joseph J. Sabia, Laura M. Argys, Benjamin Hansen, Hani Mansour, Susan L. Averett, Dominic J. Brewer, Kevin Schnepel, Jeffrey S. Zax and Daniel Mont. Their work appears in journals such as Economics of Education Review, Journal of Health Economics, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Health Economics and The Analyst.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact