Daniel Vickers

38 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Daniel Vickers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Anthropology 106
  • Marketing 63
  • Health 47
  • Economics and Econometrics 137
  • Transportation 31
Replace Peter G. Goheen with:
Peter G. Goheen Canada
James T. Lemon Canada
A. G. L. Shaw India
Patricia Nelson Limerick United States
Alfred Runte United States
John A. Jakle United States
Emrys Jones United Kingdom
John R. Stilgoe United States
Claude Raffestin Switzerland
Mark David Spence United States
Daniel Vickers relative to Peter G. Goheen Canada Peter G. Goheen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Peter G. Goheen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Vickers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Vickers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Vickers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Vickers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Vickers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Vickers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Vickers. The network helps show where Daniel Vickers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Vickers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Vickers Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Vickers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199051
2 201544
3
Creating the National Classification of Census Output Areas: Data, Methods and Results
200537
4 199534
5 198732
6 199731
7 199925
8
Introducing the area classification of output areas.
200623
9 199819
10 199517
11
A New Classification Of UK Local Authorities Using 2001 Census Key Statistics
200317
12 198816
13 198316
14 199415
15 201013
16 198511
17 200411
18 199311
19 201310
20 201010

About Daniel Vickers

Daniel Vickers is a scholar working on Anthropology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Economics and Econometrics and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 44 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colonialism, slavery, and trade (9 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (8 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers), Rural development and sustainability (4 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (106 citations), Marketing (63 citations), Health (47 citations), Economics and Econometrics (137 citations) and Transportation (31 citations). Daniel Vickers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip Rees, Mark H. Birkin, John R. Bockstoce, Mark Alan Green, Danny Dorling, S. V. Subramanian, Briton Cooper Busch, Robert Gross, Dimitris Ballas and John Pritchard. Their work appears in journals such as The William and Mary Quarterly, The New England Quarterly, The Economic History Review, International Journal of Maritime History and Journal of the Early Republic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact