Emrys Jones

1.6k citations
66 papers · 744 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Emrys Jones

55 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Emrys Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Urban Studies 134
  • Geography, Planning and Development 91
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94
  • Literature and Literary Theory 78
  • History 66
Replace Paul Claval with:
Paul Claval France
Bernard Debarbieux Switzerland
G. E. Mingay United Kingdom
J. N. L. Baker United Kingdom
Graeme Davison Australia
John A. Jakle United States
Hugh Clout United Kingdom
Peter G. Goheen Canada
T. W. Freeman United Kingdom
Richard H. Schein United States
Emrys Jones relative to Paul Claval France Paul Claval's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Paul Claval · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emrys Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emrys Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emrys Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emrys Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emrys Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emrys Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emrys Jones. The network helps show where Emrys Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emrys Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emrys Jones Line = papers co-authored together Emrys Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196172
2 199261
3
An introduction to social geography
197738
4 198037
5 199034
6
Readings in social geography
197531
7 199131
8 196431
9
Towns and Cities
196629
10 196129
11 197028
12 195625
13 197623
14 196123
15 198122
16 197421
17 198717
18 196516
19 199114
20 196313

About Emrys Jones

Emrys Jones is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Literature and Literary Theory, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 66 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (7 papers), Rural development and sustainability (5 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (5 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Offshore Engineering and Technologies (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (134 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (91 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (94 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (78 citations) and History (66 citations). Emrys Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include James E. Vance, John Eyles, G. K. Hunter, Brian Robson, Janet Adelman, Beverly Duncan, David Cadman, J. T. Coppock, James Bird and W. M. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Journal, The Modern Language Review, Economic Geography, Geographical Review and Geoforum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact