Daniel Tucker

31 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Daniel Tucker
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 37
  • Clinical Psychology 164
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 45
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 112
Replace Rodney J. Lane with:
Rodney J. Lane Australia
S. Carroll United Kingdom
H. Backmund Germany
Laura Palazzolo United States
Keiko Kunitoki Japan
Guillem Pailhez Spain
David Ginsberg United States
Valdir de Aquino Lemos Brazil
Kimberly Kelly United States
Kathleen E. McKay United States
Daniel Tucker relative to Rodney J. Lane Australia Rodney J. Lane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Rodney J. Lane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Tucker. The network helps show where Daniel Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Tucker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Tucker Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Tucker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000140
2 1996109
3 200278
4 198454
5 199741
6 199038
7 199733
8 198528
9 198624
10 195123
11 195522
12 199521
13 200219
14 198414
15 199314
16 200813
17 199311
18 20067
19 19906
20 19936

About Daniel Tucker

Daniel Tucker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital heart defects research (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (37 citations), Clinical Psychology (164 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (45 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (112 citations). Daniel Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alan Kim Johnson, David L. Roth, Paul J. Lombroso, Rachel Hunt, Deborah Hyink, P L St John, C K Abrass, Vijittra Leardkamolkarn, Mary Ann Accavitti and Dale R. Abrahamson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Hypertension, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Circulation Research and Psychology Health & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact