American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
14.8k papers
receiving
588.4k citations
Peers
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
Endocrine and Autonomic Systems141.9k
Behavioral Neuroscience26.4k
Physiology150.3k
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine86.4k
Nutrition and Dietetics52.2k
Replace Life Sciences with:
Life SciencesUnited States
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and MetabolismUnited States
European Journal of PharmacologyUnited States
British Journal of PharmacologyUnited Kingdom
Neuroscience LettersUnited States
Physiology & BehaviorUnited States
DiabetesUnited States
The Journal of PhysiologyUnited States
American Journal of Physiology-Legacy ContentUnited States
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental TherapeuticsUnited States
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiologyrelative toLife SciencesUnited StatesLife Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Life Sciences · 1×
×2.5142k/57kEAS
×0.626k/41kBN
×1.0150k/150kPHYSI
×1.886k/49kCCM
×1.052k/50kND
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.
About American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
The 15.0k papers published in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 614.7k indexed citations . Papers published in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology usually cover Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (4.2k papers), Behavioral Neuroscience (868 papers), Physiology (4.5k papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (3.2k papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1.9k papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (1.8k papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1.6k papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (1.6k papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1.3k papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (1.1k papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (982 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (942 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology are Barry E. Levin, Timothy J. Bartness, James G. Tidball, J. A. Scott Kelso, Shaun F. Morrison, James M. Krueger, Timothy H. Moran, Andrej A. Romanovsky, Ambrose A. Dunn-Meynell and Gerald F. DiBona.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.