Psychology Health & Medicine

2.5k papers and 44.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Psychology Health & Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 44.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychology Health & Medicine usually cover Clinical Psychology (820 papers), General Health Professions (663 papers) and Social Psychology (444 papers) specifically the topics of Behavioral Health and Interventions (258 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (206 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology Health & Medicine are Wim H. van Brakel, Kenneth I. Pakenham, Miriam Heijnders, Laura Nyblade, Ersilia Menesini, Christina Salmivalli, Mitchell G. Weiss, D Somma, Jayashree Ramakrishna and G Foster.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychology Health & Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology Health & Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology Health & Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Psychology Health & Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology Health & Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology Health & Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology Health & Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025