Daniel Thomas Smith
Impact in
-
- Medical Education and Admissions
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Diversity and Career in Medicine
Papers in
-
- Medical Education and Admissions 9
- Innovations in Medical Education 2
-
- Medication Adherence and Compliance 1
- Co-authors
- ELISABETH W. PAICE (1 shared paper)Paul Alexander Tiffin (7 shared papers)Sally Curtis (1 shared paper)Jon S. Dowell (3 shared papers)Lewis William Paton (5 shared papers)I. C. McManus (3 shared papers)Jennifer Cleland (1 shared paper)Sandra Nicholson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (6 papers)BMC Medical Education (3 papers)Medical Education (2 papers)Medical Teacher (2 papers)The Clinical Teacher (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Thomas Smith
17 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 157
- Gender Studies 53
- Emergency Medical Services 24
- Family Practice 6
- General Health Professions 52
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Thomas Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Thomas Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Thomas Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Thomas Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Thomas Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Thomas Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Thomas Smith. The network helps show where Daniel Thomas Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Thomas Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1 |
About Daniel Thomas Smith
Daniel Thomas Smith is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Gender Studies, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 17 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Education and Admissions (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (1 paper), Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper), Workplace Violence and Bullying (1 paper), Diversity and Career in Medicine (1 paper) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (157 citations), Gender Studies (53 citations), Emergency Medical Services (24 citations), Family Practice (6 citations) and General Health Professions (52 citations). Daniel Thomas Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include ELISABETH W. PAICE, Paul Alexander Tiffin, Sally Curtis, Jon S. Dowell, Lewis William Paton, I. C. McManus, Jennifer Cleland, Sandra Nicholson, Steve Thornton and Thomas E Oppé. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Medical Education, Medical Education, Medical Teacher and The Clinical Teacher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.