Daniel S. Gardner

41 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

Daniel S. Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • Demography 104
  • Linguistics and Language 37
  • General Health Professions 170
  • Public Administration 25
Replace Mona Weiss with:
Mona Weiss Germany
Hyunsook Yoon South Korea
W. van der Vaart Netherlands
Linda E. Francis United States
M. Elise Radina United States
Marilyn K. Potts United States
Margaret Shapiro Australia
Jesper Andreasson Sweden
Beate Küpper Germany
Sue Thomas Australia
Daniel S. Gardner relative to Mona Weiss Germany Mona Weiss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.5×
Mona Weiss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Gardner. The network helps show where Daniel S. Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Gardner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017128
2 201369
3 201859
4 201057
5 200239
6 201638
7 200534
8 201133
9 200832
10 200925
11 200424
12 200423
13 201820
14 200619
15 202117
16 201914
17 201514
18 201813
19 200912
20 201811

About Daniel S. Gardner

Daniel S. Gardner is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 42 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (3 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Demography (104 citations), Linguistics and Language (37 citations), General Health Professions (170 citations) and Public Administration (25 citations). Daniel S. Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Betty J. Kramer, Meredith Doherty, Alexis Kuerbis, Alison Moore, Frederick Muench, R. Kirk Belnap, Dan P. Dewey, Allison Werner‐Lin, Sarah Johnson and Angela Ghesquiere. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Annals of Palliative Medicine, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, Innovation in Aging and Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact