Annals of Palliative Medicine

2.7k papers and 16.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Annals of Palliative Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 16.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Palliative Medicine usually cover Surgery (621 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (537 papers) and Oncology (451 papers) specifically the topics of Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (312 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (91 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Palliative Medicine are Edward Chow, Mellar P. Davis, Rajiv Panikkar, Charles B. Simone, Candice Johnstone, Shayna E. Rich, Min Cheol Chang, Shalini Dalal, Carlo DeAngelis and Rony Dev.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Palliative Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Palliative Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Palliative Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Palliative Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Palliative Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Palliative Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Palliative Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025