Rick O’Gorman

21 papers receiving 891 citations

Peers

Rick O’Gorman
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Applied Psychology 162
  • Safety Research 219
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 242
  • Social Psychology 301
  • Sociology and Political Science 586
Replace Richard Ronay with:
Richard Ronay Netherlands
Rebecca Neel United States
Jessica D. Remedios United States
Sau-lai Lee Hong Kong
Catherine Molho Netherlands
Scott Akalis United States
Gary D. Sherman United States
Nadira S. Faber United Kingdom
Melissa M. McDonald United States
Annique Smeding France
Rick O’Gorman relative to Richard Ronay Netherlands Richard Ronay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Richard Ronay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rick O’Gorman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rick O’Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rick O’Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rick O’Gorman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rick O’Gorman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rick O’Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rick O’Gorman. The network helps show where Rick O’Gorman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rick O’Gorman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rick O’Gorman Line = papers co-authored together Rick O’Gorman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008164
2 2008100
3 200796
4 200790
5 201878
6 201969
7 200555
8 200345
9 201543
10 200736
11 200735
12 201131
13 200824
14 201212
15
The IAT as a predictor of spontaneous food choice: The case of fruits versus snacks
200711
16 20209
17 20069
18 20176
19 20084
20 20183

About Rick O’Gorman

Rick O’Gorman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Safety Research and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (11 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (162 citations), Safety Research (219 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (242 citations), Social Psychology (301 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (586 citations). Rick O’Gorman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Sloan Wilson, Mark van Vugt, Marco Perugini, Joseph Henrich, Andrew Prestwich, Ralph R. Miller, Mark Conner, Daniel Redhead, Juliette Richetin and Karen L. Ayres. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution and Human Behavior, Human Nature, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Scientific Reports and Journal of Environmental Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact