Daniel Porta‐Casteràs

15 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

Daniel Porta‐Casteràs
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 25
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 56
Replace Katherine A. Grisanzio with:
Katherine A. Grisanzio United States
Ana Munjiza Serbia
Anna Cyriac Canada
Ilinca Serbanescu Germany
Rachel Phillips United States
Patrick Stetz United States
Martin Kockler Germany
Stijn Bijttebier Belgium
Emily K. Clarke‐Rubright United States
Jinrong Sun China
Daniel Porta‐Casteràs relative to Katherine A. Grisanzio United States Katherine A. Grisanzio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Katherine A. Grisanzio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Porta‐Casteràs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Porta‐Casteràs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Porta‐Casteràs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Porta‐Casteràs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Porta‐Casteràs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Porta‐Casteràs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Porta‐Casteràs. The network helps show where Daniel Porta‐Casteràs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Porta‐Casteràs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Porta‐Casteràs Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Porta‐Casteràs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 202166
2 202035
3 202020
4 202319
5 202113
6 202211
7 202411
8 20216
9 20225
10 20243
11 20223
12 20242
13 20222
14 20201
15 20171

About Daniel Porta‐Casteràs

Daniel Porta‐Casteràs is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (56 citations). Daniel Porta‐Casteràs has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Narcı́s Cardoner, Carles Soriano‐Mas, Marta Cano, Diego Palao, Esther Via, Maria Serra-Blasco, Joan A. Camprodon, Colleen Loo, Anton Albajes‐Eizagirre and Erick J. Canales‐Rodríguez. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Journal of Affective Disorders, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact