Daniel Pfisterer

920 citations
18 papers · 818 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Pfisterer

18 papers receiving 804 citations

Peers

Daniel Pfisterer
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Materials Chemistry 593
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 1
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 167
  • Condensed Matter Physics 25
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 34
Replace Jiangbin Wu with:
Jiangbin Wu China
Qing Pang China
Bei Deng China
Hitoe Habuchi Japan
Kate G. Godinho Ireland
Jungcheol Kim South Korea
Juhi Pandey India
Yu‐Chen Leng China
George B. Palmer United States
Daniel Pfisterer relative to Jiangbin Wu China Jiangbin Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jiangbin Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pfisterer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pfisterer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pfisterer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pfisterer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pfisterer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pfisterer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pfisterer. The network helps show where Daniel Pfisterer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pfisterer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pfisterer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pfisterer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2003196
2 2007159
3 200184
4 200379
5 200746
6 200745
7 200340
8 200231
9 200527
10 200326
11 200625
12 200319
13 200611
14 200611
15 20049
16 20018
17 20011
18 20011

About Daniel Pfisterer

Daniel Pfisterer is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ZnO doping and properties (10 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (4 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (3 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (1 paper), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (1 paper) and Semiconductor materials and interfaces (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (593 citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (1 citation), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (167 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (25 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (34 citations). Daniel Pfisterer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Russia. Frequent co-authors include D.M. Hofmann, Helder R. Alves, Joachim Sann, N. G. Romanov, Frank Leiter, Ramón Tena‐Zaera, Vicente Muñoz-Sanjosé, Gerhard Pensl, Thomas Frank and Yunbin He. Their work appears in journals such as Physica B Condensed Matter, Applied Physics A, physica status solidi (a), Optical Materials and physica status solidi (b).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact