Applied Physics A

18.9k papers and 307.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 18.9k papers published in Applied Physics A in the last decades have received a total of 307.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Physics A usually cover Materials Chemistry (9.5k papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (7.1k papers) and Biomedical Engineering (4.2k papers) specifically the topics of ZnO doping and properties (1.7k papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (1.6k papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Physics A are Leon O. Chua, Stefan Nolte, Boris N. Chichkov, Hiroyuki Yano, Antonio Norio Nakagaito, Andreas Tünnermann, A. Huczko, Leonid V. Zhigilei, R. Stanley Williams and F. von Alvensleben.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Physics A

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Physics A. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Physics A.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Physics A

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Physics A. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Physics A with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Physics A more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025