Daniel O. Segall

12 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Daniel O. Segall
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Management Science and Operations Research 208
  • Statistics and Probability 66
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 59
  • Computer Networks and Communications 105
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 36
Replace William R. Koch with:
William R. Koch United States
Gerard L. Kiely United States
Prathiba Natesan United States
Robert D. Ankenmann United States
Tse-Chi Hsu United States
Mary Pommerich United States
Gary Skaggs United States
R. J. De Ayala United States
Insu Paek United States
Daniel R. Eignor United States
Daniel O. Segall relative to William R. Koch United States William R. Koch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
William R. Koch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel O. Segall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel O. Segall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel O. Segall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel O. Segall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel O. Segall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel O. Segall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel O. Segall. The network helps show where Daniel O. Segall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Daniel O. Segall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel O. Segall Line = papers co-authored together Daniel O. Segall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1996166
2 200687
3 198038
4 200137
5 200421
6 200219
7 199416
8 201413
9 199410
10 20087
11 19937
12
Calibrating CAT Pools and Online Pretest Items Using Marginal Maximum Likelihood Methods
20045

About Daniel O. Segall

Daniel O. Segall is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Software and Statistics and Probability, having authored 12 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (6 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Technology and Data Analysis (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (208 citations), Statistics and Probability (66 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (59 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (105 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (36 citations). Daniel O. Segall has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronald E. Riggio, Howard S. Frıedman, William Shepherd, James C. Beaty, Kenneth Pearlman, Nancy T. Tippins, Fritz Drasgow, Mary Pommerich, Lihua Yao and Bruce Bloxom. Their work appears in journals such as Psychometrika, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Applied Psychological Measurement, Journal of Educational Measurement and Personnel Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact