Daniel Lunn

28 papers receiving 900 citations

Peers

Daniel Lunn
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Management Science and Operations Research 167
  • Nephrology 76
  • Virology 20
  • Small Animals 27
  • Genetics 82
Replace Rocco J. Casagrande with:
Rocco J. Casagrande United States
Michael S. Ringel United States
Mingxia Zhang China
Michael J. Podolsky United States
Haobo Zhang China
Judit Kumuthini South Africa
Qin Luo China
Shuangyue Zhang China
Robin Lee United States
Tracy L. Hill United States
Daniel Lunn relative to Rocco J. Casagrande United States Rocco J. Casagrande's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×
Rocco J. Casagrande · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lunn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lunn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lunn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lunn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lunn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lunn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lunn. The network helps show where Daniel Lunn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lunn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lunn Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lunn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018183
2 2013106
3 201574
4 201664
5 201957
6 201456
7 201447
8 201445
9 202040
10 201936
11 202035
12 202230
13 202129
14 201418
15 201317
16 201417
17 201813
18 20149
19 20169
20 20189

About Daniel Lunn

Daniel Lunn is a scholar working on Virology, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research, Clinical Psychology and Ecology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 932 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (3 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (3 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (3 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers) and Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (167 citations), Nephrology (76 citations), Virology (20 citations), Small Animals (27 citations) and Genetics (82 citations). Daniel Lunn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Bent Flyvbjerg, Alexander Budzier, Atif Ansar, Allison Stewart, Søren L. Buhl, Massimo Garbuio, Dan P. Lovallo, Bert van Wee, Chantal C. Cantarelli and Carsten Glenting. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Journal of Breath Research, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Journal of Nephrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact