Daniel K. Ting

22 papers receiving 177 citations

Peers

Daniel K. Ting
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Family Practice 20
  • Health 43
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
  • Health Informatics 3
  • General Health Professions 48
Replace Mollie A. Biewald with:
Mollie A. Biewald United States
Najwa Al-Mously Saudi Arabia
Stephanie Morrison United States
Pablo Herrera Chile
Thomas E. Stenvig United States
Jonathan Lio United States
Patrick Alexander Wachholz Brazil
Nabia Tariq Pakistan
Zhimeng Xu China
James Henry Obol Uganda
Daniel K. Ting relative to Mollie A. Biewald United States Mollie A. Biewald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Mollie A. Biewald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel K. Ting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel K. Ting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel K. Ting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel K. Ting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel K. Ting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel K. Ting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel K. Ting. The network helps show where Daniel K. Ting may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel K. Ting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel K. Ting Line = papers co-authored together Daniel K. Ting links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202028
2 201826
3 201119
4 201817
5 202215
6 202013
7 20179
8 20188
9 20197
10 20236
11 20176
12 20224
13 20174
14 20154
15 20183
16 20233
17 20153
18 20162
19 20182
20 20231

About Daniel K. Ting

Daniel K. Ting is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Health, Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases, having authored 24 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Social Media in Health Education (3 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (20 citations), Health (43 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and General Health Professions (48 citations). Daniel K. Ting has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Teresa M. Chan, Brent Thoma, Matthew B. Lanktree, Hervé Le Moual, Fareen Zaver, Valerie Le Sage, Charles Viau, Eve Purdy, Shahbaz Syed and Michael Bravo. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Canadian Medical Association Journal, AEM Education and Training, Perspectives on Medical Education and Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact