Jonathan Lio

471 citations
24 papers · 259 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Lio

23 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Jonathan Lio
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Infectious Diseases 58
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Family Practice 4
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 3
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 53
Replace Devika Patel with:
Devika Patel United States
Sylvia Kiwuwa-Muyingo Kenya
Anna Forbes United Kingdom
Jacqueline Ellison United States
Mohammed R. Algethami Saudi Arabia
Samantha Carlson Australia
Linda Agyemang United States
Lorna Sutcliffe United Kingdom
Hayat Ahmed United States
Jonathan Lio relative to Devika Patel United States Devika Patel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Devika Patel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Lio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Lio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Lio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Lio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Lio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Lio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Lio. The network helps show where Jonathan Lio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Lio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Lio Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Lio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201545
2 202144
3 201732
4 201628
5 202124
6 202214
7 202212
8 202110
9 20178
10 20176
11 20235
12 20195
13 20215
14 20224
15 20164
16 20192
17 20202
18 20202
19 20182
20 20162

About Jonathan Lio

Jonathan Lio is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Oncology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (58 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), Family Practice (4 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (3 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (53 citations). Jonathan Lio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Renslow Sherer, Hongmei Dong, Shalini Reddy, Yanqing Ye, Brian Cooper, Qian Cao, Rongrong Yang, Liping Deng, Yajun Yan and John F. McConville. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Perspectives on Medical Education, Heart, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice and Sexual Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact