Daniel Hennes

1.7k citations
52 papers · 835 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hennes

47 papers receiving 797 citations

Peers

Daniel Hennes
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Aerospace Engineering 267
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 219
  • Management Science and Operations Research 107
  • Artificial Intelligence 237
  • Safety Research 52
Replace Benjamin Stewart with:
Benjamin Stewart United States
Brandon Rothrock United States
Subramanian Ramamoorthy United Kingdom
Wenquan Feng China
Eiichi Osawa Japan
S. Narayanan United States
Guy Lever United Kingdom
Jeffrey S. Norris United States
Gregg H. Gunsch United States
Daniel Hennes relative to Benjamin Stewart United States Benjamin Stewart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
Benjamin Stewart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hennes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hennes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hennes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hennes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hennes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hennes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hennes. The network helps show where Daniel Hennes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hennes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hennes Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hennes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015201
2 201275
3 201255
4 201539
5 201533
6 201631
7 201321
8 201621
9 201121
10 201520
11 201119
12 201919
13 201918
14 201618
15 201617
16 201717
17 202215
18 201415
19 200915
20 201814

About Daniel Hennes

Daniel Hennes is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Management Science and Operations Research and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 52 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (11 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (10 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (10 papers), Game Theory and Applications (9 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (6 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers) and Spacecraft Dynamics and Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (267 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (219 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (107 citations), Artificial Intelligence (237 citations) and Safety Research (52 citations). Daniel Hennes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Karl Tuyls, Daan Bloembergen, Dario Izzo, Michael Kaisers, Daniel Claes, Wim Meeussen, Marc Toussaint, Matthias Rauterberg, A. Visser and Danny Driess. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology and Connection Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact