Daniel Claes

417 citations
20 papers · 316 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Claes

15 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Daniel Claes
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 167
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 20
  • Artificial Intelligence 70
  • Computer Networks and Communications 45
  • Aerospace Engineering 48
Replace Peter Novák with:
Peter Novák Germany
Seng Keat Gan Australia
Ebtehal Turki Saho Alotaibi Saudi Arabia
Matthew E. Argyle United States
Krishna Kalyanam United States
Mike Phillips United States
Yulong Ding China
Hossein Tehrani Nik Nejad Japan
Yehuda Elmaliach Israel
José J. Acevedo Spain
Daniel Claes relative to Peter Novák Germany Peter Novák's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Peter Novák · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Claes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Claes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Claes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Claes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Claes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Claes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Claes. The network helps show where Daniel Claes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Claes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Claes Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Claes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201279
2 201257
3 201741
4 201840
5 201522
6 201321
7 201415
8 20158
9 20158
10 20147
11 20145
12 20174
13 20153
14 20163
15
CALU: collision avoidance with localization uncertainty
20121
16 20131
17
Effective Approximations for Spatial Task Allocation Problems
20151
18 20120
19 20140
20 20170

About Daniel Claes

Daniel Claes is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (9 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (5 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (4 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (3 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (3 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (2 papers), Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems (2 papers) and Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (167 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (20 citations), Artificial Intelligence (70 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (45 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (48 citations). Daniel Claes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Karl Tuyls, Daniel Hennes, Wim Meeussen, Frans Adriaan Oliehoek, Bijan Ranjbar-Sahraei, Gerhard Weiß, Wiebe van der Hoek and Daan Bloembergen. Their work appears in journals such as Autonomous Robots, Lecture notes in computer science, Communications in computer and information science, Elsevier eBooks and Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact