Daniel G. Todd

760 citations
9 papers · 636 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel G. Todd

9 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers

Daniel G. Todd
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Oncology 214
  • Otorhinolaryngology 29
  • Cancer Research 87
  • Developmental Neuroscience 20
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 105
Replace William G. Benson with:
William G. Benson United States
Adam J. Kole United States
Cristina Caramés Spain
Yuan Zhou China
Baiyao Wang China
Keiko Tadokoro Japan
Xin Mei China
Caroline I. Schnegg United States
Caroline S. Hirst United Kingdom
Jessica M. Molkentine United States
Daniel G. Todd relative to William G. Benson United States William G. Benson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
William G. Benson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Todd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Todd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Todd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Todd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Todd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Todd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Todd. The network helps show where Daniel G. Todd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Todd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel G. Todd Line = papers co-authored together Daniel G. Todd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1997356
2 201472
3
The inducible expression of dominant-negative epidermal growth factor receptor-CD533 results in radiosensitization of human mammary carcinoma cells.
199969
4
Ionizing radiation induces a transient increase in cytosolic free [Ca2+] in human epithelial tumor cells.
199453
5 199934
6 201733
7 19989
8 19897
9 19893

About Daniel G. Todd

Daniel G. Todd is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (2 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (214 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (29 citations), Cancer Research (87 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (20 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (105 citations). Daniel G. Todd has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ross B. Mikkelsen, Kristoffer Valerie, Rupert Schmidt‐Ullrich, Paul Dent, Joseph N. Contessa, Brian D. Kavanagh, Matthew Browne, Dean B. Reardon, Geoffrey Bowers and Ignacio Muñoz-Sanjuán. Their work appears in journals such as Oncogene, Addictive Behaviors, Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, FEBS Letters and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact