Daniel E. Elswick

10 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Elswick
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Biological Psychiatry 61
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 102
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 60
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 11
  • Applied Psychology 13
Replace Hernán Silva with:
Hernán Silva Chile
Emily M. Parker United States
Chris A. Kelly United States
April Hargreaves Ireland
Wenting Chen China
Abigail I. Nash United States
Maureen Fay-McCarthy United States
Victoria L. Cole United Kingdom
Grant McQueen United Kingdom
Mareen Hoerst Germany
Daniel E. Elswick relative to Hernán Silva Chile Hernán Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Hernán Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Elswick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Elswick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Elswick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Elswick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Elswick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Elswick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Elswick. The network helps show where Daniel E. Elswick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Elswick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Elswick Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Elswick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2014212
2 201873
3
Measurement-based Care in Psychiatry-Past, Present, and Future.
201870
4 201821
5 201412
6 201910
7
The Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): A Clinician-administered Tool with Categorical, Dimensional, and Numeric Output-Conceptual Development, Design, and Description of the SCIP.
201610
8 20165
9 20242
10 20211
11 20260

About Daniel E. Elswick

Daniel E. Elswick is a scholar working on Philosophy, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 11 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (61 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (102 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (60 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (11 citations) and Applied Psychology (13 citations). Daniel E. Elswick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Robert Sweet, Matthew L. MacDonald, Wei Hu, Sujan Phani Kumar Kasani, Xiaofei Shi, Ahmed Aboraya, Henry A. Nasrallah, Haibin Tang, Feng Yang and Ming Li. Their work appears in journals such as Addictive Behaviors, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Schizophrenia Research, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Academic Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact