Shweta Pathak

38 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Shweta Pathak
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Speech and Hearing 108
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 51
  • Family Practice 20
  • General Health Professions 77
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 4
Replace Andrea Neiman with:
Andrea Neiman United States
Renu Singh United States
Abdullah A. Saeed Saudi Arabia
Samar Rachidi Lebanon
Rita Farah Lebanon
Arūnas Valiulis Lithuania
Mette Holst Denmark
Surarong Chinwong Thailand
Jara Díaz-Jiménez Spain
Jessica White United States
Shweta Pathak relative to Andrea Neiman United States Andrea Neiman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Andrea Neiman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shweta Pathak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shweta Pathak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shweta Pathak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shweta Pathak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shweta Pathak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shweta Pathak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shweta Pathak. The network helps show where Shweta Pathak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shweta Pathak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shweta Pathak Line = papers co-authored together Shweta Pathak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021103
2 202169
3 201768
4 200328
5 201622
6 202022
7 202120
8 200920
9 201518
10 202212
11 201111
12 201610
13 20219
14 20218
15 20158
16 20237
17 20216
18 20226
19 20156
20
Does care consultation affect use of VHA versus non-VHA care?
20195

About Shweta Pathak

Shweta Pathak is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Family Practice and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (6 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (3 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (108 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (51 citations), Family Practice (20 citations), General Health Professions (77 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (4 citations). Shweta Pathak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Y. Urick, Carrie Blanchard, Stephanie K. Daniels, Jane Anderson, Robert O. Morgan, Rahul Kundu, Dima M. Qato, John C. Rosenbek, Moti Lal and M. L. Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, Dysphagia, Preventing Chronic Disease, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact