Academic Psychiatry

2.6k papers and 26.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Academic Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 26.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Academic Psychiatry usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k papers), General Health Professions (952 papers) and Clinical Psychology (578 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (889 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (349 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (307 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Academic Psychiatry are Laura Weiss Roberts, Richard Balon, Joel Yager, John Coverdale, Woo Jin Kim, Frederick Sierles, Christine Moutier, Glen O. Gabbard, Laura B. Dunn and Brian Hodges.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Academic Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Academic Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Academic Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in Academic Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Academic Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Academic Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Academic Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025