Cheryl Hill

12 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Cheryl Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Biochemistry 36
  • Physiology 104
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 32
  • Nephrology 20
  • Clinical Psychology 58
Replace Damodhar P. Suresh with:
Damodhar P. Suresh United States
David Ohara Brazil
Michael Fu Sweden
Mark Orme United Kingdom
Til Stürmer United States
Mathieu Firmann Switzerland
Sinéad O’Brien Ireland
Eugenia Vlachou Greece
Julie Marker Australia
Cheryl Hill relative to Damodhar P. Suresh United States Damodhar P. Suresh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Damodhar P. Suresh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Hill. The network helps show where Cheryl Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Hill Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1995116
2 200767
3 200751
4 200941
5 200725
6 200615
7 200915
8 200514
9 20088
10
The Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): A Clinician-administered Tool with Categorical, Dimensional, and Numeric Output-Conceptual Development, Design, and Description of the SCIP.
20168
11 20084
12 20071
13 20190

About Cheryl Hill

Cheryl Hill is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (36 citations), Physiology (104 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (32 citations), Nephrology (20 citations) and Clinical Psychology (58 citations). Cheryl Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michelle M. Langer, Tasha M. Burwinkle, James W. Varni, David Thissen, John D. Ruby, György Losonczy, Rocco C. Venuto, Changbin Qiu, Lennie Samsell and Tamás Sütö. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Pulmonology, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Kidney International and Medical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact