Daniel Clesse

925 citations
18 papers · 740 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Clesse

18 papers receiving 725 citations

Peers

Daniel Clesse
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 298
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 201
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
  • Biological Psychiatry 5
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 57
Replace Jenny M. Ekholm with:
Jenny M. Ekholm United States
Toni D. Wolinsky United States
Michael A. Belenky Israel
Keith M. Garner Netherlands
André K. Ragnauth United States
Kyle D. Ketchesin United States
Sonja J. Stutz United States
Diana E. Pankevich United States
Yichao Wei China
Andrew R. Rau United States
Daniel Clesse relative to Jenny M. Ekholm United States Jenny M. Ekholm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jenny M. Ekholm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Clesse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Clesse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Clesse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Clesse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Clesse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Clesse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Clesse. The network helps show where Daniel Clesse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Clesse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Clesse Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Clesse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2010128
2 2008103
3 201496
4 201574
5 200869
6 200957
7 199343
8 201043
9 200836
10 201826
11 200814
12 200912
13 201512
14 198910
15 19908
16 20146
17 20232
18
La production de proteines humaines dans le sang d'animaux transgeniques
19901

About Daniel Clesse

Daniel Clesse is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (9 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Protein purification and stability (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1 paper), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper) and Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (298 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (201 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations), Biological Psychiatry (5 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (57 citations). Daniel Clesse has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Paul Pévet, Étienne Challet, Marc Cuesta, Brigitte Lina Kieffer, Jorge Mendoza, Julie Le Merrer, Jérôme A. J. Becker, Emmanuel Darcq, Pierre-Éric Lutz and Abdel‐Mouttalib Ouagazzal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Biological Psychiatry, Brain Structure and Function, Neuropsychopharmacology and FEBS Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact