Daniel Clesse

14 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Daniel Clesse
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 328
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 61
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 265
  • Biological Psychiatry 31
  • Aging 16
Replace Matthew R. Bailey with:
Matthew R. Bailey United States
Jaswinder Kumar United States
Tarek Zghoul United Kingdom
Daniel L. Hummer United States
Valeriy Sergeyev Russia
Shu K. E. Tam United Kingdom
William D. Todd United States
Yuko Yoshinobu Japan
Luciana Pinato Brazil
Robert W. Moyer Australia
Daniel Clesse relative to Matthew R. Bailey United States Matthew R. Bailey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Matthew R. Bailey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Clesse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Clesse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Clesse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Clesse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Clesse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Clesse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Clesse. The network helps show where Daniel Clesse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Clesse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Clesse Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Clesse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2010126
2 2008102
3 201495
4 201570
5 200868
6 200957
7 201041
8 200836
9 201826
10 200813
11 200912
12 201512
13 20146
14 20231

About Daniel Clesse

Daniel Clesse is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Social Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (9 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (328 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (61 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (265 citations), Biological Psychiatry (31 citations) and Aging (16 citations). Daniel Clesse has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Paul Pévet, Étienne Challet, Marc Cuesta, Brigitte L. Kieffer, Jorge Mendoza, Julie Le Merrer, Jérôme A. J. Becker, Pierre-Éric Lutz, Emmanuel Darcq and Abdel‐Mouttalib Ouagazzal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Biological Psychiatry, Brain Structure and Function, Journal of Neuroendocrinology and Experimental Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact