Daniel Bump

2.9k citations
119 papers · 1.5k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Bump

105 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniel Bump
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 556
  • Algebra and Number Theory 720
  • Mathematical Physics 1.1k
  • Geometry and Topology 869
  • Statistics and Probability 132
Replace I. P. Goulden with:
I. P. Goulden Canada
John R. Stembridge United States
Zeév Rudnick Israel
Alain Lascoux France
James Brazil
Thomas Lam United States
Mark Haiman United States
Lauren Williams United States
Michel Brion France
Pierre de la Harpe Switzerland
Daniel Bump relative to I. P. Goulden Canada I. P. Goulden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
I. P. Goulden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bump

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bump's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bump with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bump more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bump

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bump. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bump. The network helps show where Daniel Bump may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bump, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bump Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bump links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199097
2 200478
3 199267
4 198964
5 200643
6 201142
7 199040
8 200036
9 198436
10 199634
11
199233
12 200433
13 201533
14 201131
15 198830
16 200229
17
Weyl Group Multiple Dirichlet Series: Type A Combinatorial Theory
201127
18 200725
19 201325
20
Toeplitz minors
200024

About Daniel Bump

Daniel Bump is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 119 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Geometry (82 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (32 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (25 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (24 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (19 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (17 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (15 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Identities (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (556 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (720 citations), Mathematical Physics (1.1k citations), Geometry and Topology (869 citations) and Statistics and Probability (132 citations). Daniel Bump has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Solomon Friedberg, Jeffrey Hoffstein, Ben Brubaker, David Ginzburg, Persi Diaconis, Anne Schilling, Alex Gamburd, Henryk Iwaniec, Dorian Goldfeld and Jeffrey D. Vaaler. Their work appears in journals such as Duke Mathematical Journal, Inventiones mathematicae, Annals of Mathematics, Lecture notes in mathematics and Journal of Number Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact