Lecture notes in mathematics

2.1k papers and 184.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 184.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics usually cover Mathematical Physics (594 papers), Geometry and Topology (486 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (321 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topics in Algebra (209 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (146 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lecture notes in mathematics are Shiing-Shen Chern, Daniel Henry, Kai Diethelm, R. R. Phelps, Michael Růžička, Robin Hartshorne, Rufus Bowen, Jean-Pierre Serre, Julian Musielak and J. P. May.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Lecture notes in mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lecture notes in mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lecture notes in mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025