Lecture notes in mathematics

417.7k citations
17.7k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
    • Advanced Algebra and Geometry
    • Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
    • Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
    • Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory

Papers in

Lecture notes in mathematics

12.8k papers receiving 300.3k citations

Peers

Lecture notes in mathematics
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Mathematical Physics 160.2k
  • Geometry and Topology 138.6k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 64.0k
  • Applied Mathematics 102.7k
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 25.6k
Replace Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with:
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society United States
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society United States
American Mathematical Monthly United States
Communications in Mathematical Physics United States
Pacific Journal of Mathematics United States
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications United States
Annals of Mathematics United States
Mathematics of Computation United States
Advances in Mathematics United States
Journal of Functional Analysis United States
Lecture notes in mathematics relative to Transactions of the American Mathematical Society United States Transactions of the American Mathematical Society's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Lecture notes in mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lecture notes in mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lecture notes in mathematics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics.

About Lecture notes in mathematics

The 17.7k papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 417.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Lecture notes in mathematics usually cover Mathematical Physics (5.8k papers), Algebra and Number Theory (2.7k papers), Geometry and Topology (5.0k papers), Applied Mathematics (3.6k papers) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (921 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topics in Algebra (1.7k papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (1.3k papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (1.2k papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (1.1k papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (968 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (931 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (905 papers) and Advanced Topology and Set Theory (753 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lecture notes in mathematics are Shiing-Shen Chern, Floris Takens, Daniel B. Henry, Kai Diethelm, Pierre Deligne, Michael Růžička, Jean-Pierre Serre, Daniel G. Quillen, Rufus Bowen and Robin Hartshorne.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact