Inventiones mathematicae

4.6k papers and 209.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.6k papers published in Inventiones mathematicae in the last decades have received a total of 209.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Inventiones mathematicae usually cover Geometry and Topology (3.1k papers), Mathematical Physics (2.7k papers) and Applied Mathematics (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (1.5k papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (1.3k papers) and Geometric and Algebraic Topology (803 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Inventiones mathematicae are Gang Tian, G. Lusztig, M. Gromov, John Tate, Vaughan F. R. Jones, Pierre Deligne, Barry Mazur, Richard E. Borcherds, Don Zagier and Sorin Popa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Inventiones mathematicae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Inventiones mathematicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Inventiones mathematicae.

Countries where authors publish in Inventiones mathematicae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Inventiones mathematicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Inventiones mathematicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inventiones mathematicae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025