Daniel Bremer

517 citations
19 papers · 309 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Bremer

17 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Daniel Bremer
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Biophysics 34
  • General Health Professions 80
  • Neurology 21
  • Health 19
  • Immunology 32
Replace Emma Bainbridge with:
Emma Bainbridge Ireland
Renato Santos de Oliveira Filho Brazil
Brian Wu United States
V. Lauwers‐Cancès France
Elizabeth Prout Parks United States
Kamilah Jackson United States
Philippe Arvers France
Peter Treasure United Kingdom
Anthony Colombo United States
Tianyu Wang China
Daniel Bremer relative to Emma Bainbridge Ireland Emma Bainbridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Emma Bainbridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bremer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bremer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bremer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bremer. The network helps show where Daniel Bremer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bremer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bremer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bremer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 198667
2 202147
3 201630
4 201523
5 201720
6 201619
7 202019
8 201715
9 201913
10 202012
11 202111
12 201811
13 20129
14 20217
15 20174
16 20201
17 20131
18 20080
19 20130

About Daniel Bremer

Daniel Bremer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Immunology, Neurology, Health and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (2 papers), Health and Medical Studies (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper) and Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (34 citations), General Health Professions (80 citations), Neurology (21 citations), Health (19 citations) and Immunology (32 citations). Daniel Bremer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include T Jacob, Olaf von dem Knesebeck, Daniel Lüdecke, Martin Härter, Helena Radbruch, Raluca Niesner, Anja E. Hauser, Laura Inhestern, Ronja Mothes and Robert Günther. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Immunology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Current Protocols in Cytometry, Cytometry Part A and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact