Current Protocols in Cytometry

409 papers and 7.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 409 papers published in Current Protocols in Cytometry in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Protocols in Cytometry usually cover Molecular Biology (239 papers), Biophysics (107 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (72 papers) specifically the topics of Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (78 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (69 papers) and Cell Image Analysis Techniques (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Protocols in Cytometry are Zbigniew Darżynkiewicz, Mario Roederer, Amicia D. Elliott, Robert A. Hoffman, Kenneth N. Fish, Peter O. Krutzik, J. Paul Robinson, John P. Nolan, Jonathan M. Irish and Nikesh Kotecha.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Protocols in Cytometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Protocols in Cytometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Protocols in Cytometry.

Countries where authors publish in Current Protocols in Cytometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Protocols in Cytometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Protocols in Cytometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Protocols in Cytometry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025