Daniel Blouin

11 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Daniel Blouin
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Family Practice 101
  • Genetics 152
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 40
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 109
  • Immunology 71
Replace Tiziana Corsetti with:
Tiziana Corsetti Italy
Mengxing Sun China
Laura Bazzi Longo Italy
Peter Ojwang Kenya
Hong-Zhang Shen China
Osama Mahmoud Azmy Egypt
Yiyuan Wu United States
Juki Ng United States
Souad Assaad France
Sophie Waldvogel Switzerland
Daniel Blouin relative to Tiziana Corsetti Italy Tiziana Corsetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×50.5×
Tiziana Corsetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Blouin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Blouin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Blouin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Blouin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Blouin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Blouin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Blouin. The network helps show where Daniel Blouin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Blouin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Blouin Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Blouin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 199687
2 200285
3 199870
4 199655
5 200251
6 199833
7
Pharmacological profiles of the human and rabbit B1 receptors.
199717
8 199715
9 201210
10 20115
11 20013
12 19721

About Daniel Blouin

Daniel Blouin is a scholar working on Family Practice, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Mast cells and histamine (1 paper), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Radiology practices and education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (101 citations), Genetics (152 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (40 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (109 citations) and Immunology (71 citations). Daniel Blouin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Charlin, Leng Hong Pheng, Domenico C. Regoli, X.K. Nguyen‐Le, C. P. Leduc, Carlos Brailovsky, Christian Sinave, Geneviève Le Templier, Fernand Gobeil and Anne Pizard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, British Journal of Pharmacology, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Hypertension and Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact