J.T.H. Connor

31 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

J.T.H. Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Biochemistry 36
  • Family Practice 11
  • Microbiology 23
  • History 32
  • Virology 12
Replace Jaclyn M. Phillips with:
Jaclyn M. Phillips United States
Soumya Bhattacharya India
Majid Khalili Iran
Margaret Pollack United States
James Harper United States
Sophie Waldvogel Switzerland
Alain M. Ngoma Japan
Vivian Graham United States
Andre B. Martel Canada
Robert H. Ebert United States
J.T.H. Connor relative to Jaclyn M. Phillips United States Jaclyn M. Phillips's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Jaclyn M. Phillips · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.T.H. Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.T.H. Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.T.H. Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.T.H. Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.T.H. Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.T.H. Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.T.H. Connor. The network helps show where J.T.H. Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.T.H. Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.T.H. Connor Line = papers co-authored together J.T.H. Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199553
2 200547
3 199938
4 200728
5 200614
6 19799
7
Commentary on : rhetorical analysis of William Harvey's de Motu cordis (1628). Authors' reply
19927
8
Conceptualizing Health Care in Rural and Remote Pre-Confederation Newfoundland as Ecosystem
20155
9 20045
10 19885
11
A Shocking Business: The Technology and Practice of Electrotherapeutics in Canada, 1840s to 1940s
19994
12 20134
13 19944
14 19844
15 20064
16 20134
17 20143
18 20173
19 19693
20 19863

About J.T.H. Connor

J.T.H. Connor is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Neurology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical History and Innovations (10 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers), Canadian Identity and History (5 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (5 papers), History of Medical Practice (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research (2 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (36 citations), Family Practice (11 citations), Microbiology (23 citations), History (32 citations) and Virology (12 citations). J.T.H. Connor has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edmund V. Capparelli, Mark Mirochnick, Kent Bottles, C. Phillip Morris, Barbara J. Anderson, R. Buller, Jennifer J. Connor, William D. Wagner, Bo Shen and Pankaj Chaturvedi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Pediatric Rheumatology, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Medical Humanities and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact