Experimental Mathematics

1.2k papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Experimental Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental Mathematics usually cover Geometry and Topology (688 papers), Mathematical Physics (491 papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (335 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (313 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (216 papers) and Analytic Number Theory Research (211 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Mathematics are Kenneth A. Brakke, Konrad Polthier, Ulrich Pinkall, Àngel Jorba, Richard Evan Schwartz, John H. Conway, N. J. A. Sloane, R. H. Hardin, Ryo Kobayashi and John Milnor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Experimental Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025