Benjamin Highton

2.5k citations
42 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Highton

39 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Benjamin Highton
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Communication 394
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.3k
  • Gender Studies 352
  • Sociology and Political Science 719
  • Strategy and Management 180
Replace Noam Lupu with:
Noam Lupu United States
Thomas Gschwend Germany
Paul W. Gronke United States
Elizabeth J. Zechmeister United States
Paul Goren United States
Lonna Rae Atkeson United States
Joseph Bafumi United States
Jeremy C. Pope United States
Jonathan S. Krasno United States
Ruth Dassonneville Canada
Benjamin Highton relative to Noam Lupu United States Noam Lupu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Noam Lupu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Highton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Highton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Highton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Highton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Highton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Highton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Highton. The network helps show where Benjamin Highton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Highton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Highton Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Highton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001197
2 1997115
3 2009113
4 2004112
5 2004111
6 200099
7 200187
8 201383
9 201172
10 199871
11 200567
12 200562
13 201759
14 200843
15 201140
16 200633
17 200029
18 200228
19 201824
20 199724

About Benjamin Highton

Benjamin Highton is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Communication, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (36 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (7 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (6 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (394 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.3k citations), Gender Studies (352 citations), Sociology and Political Science (719 citations) and Strategy and Management (180 citations). Benjamin Highton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Raymond E. Wolfinger, Cindy D. Kam, Michael S. Rocca, Ryan L. Claassen, Megan Mullin, Suzanna Linn, Amber E. Boydstun, Robert Huckfeldt, Eric M McGhee and John M. Sides. Their work appears in journals such as Political Behavior, The Journal of Politics, PS Political Science & Politics, Political Research Quarterly and American Politics Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact