American Philosophical Quarterly

848 papers and 9.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 848 papers published in American Philosophical Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 9.6k indexed citations. Papers published in American Philosophical Quarterly usually cover Philosophy (387 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (215 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (164 papers) specifically the topics of Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (211 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (201 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Philosophical Quarterly are J. L. Mackie, Peter A. French, David K. Lewis, James A. Montmarquet, Duncan Pritchard, Jaegwon Kim, Richard Foley, Héctor-Neri Castañeda, Sydney Shoemaker and Bennett W. Helm.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in American Philosophical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Philosophical Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Philosophical Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in American Philosophical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Philosophical Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Philosophical Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Philosophical Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025