John C. Green

4.9k citations
98 papers · 3.2k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

John C. Green

88 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

John C. Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.7k
  • Health 408
  • Communication 339
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.0k
  • Gender Studies 334
Replace David E. Miller with:
David E. Miller United Kingdom
Marc Howard Ross United States
Hartmut Esser Germany
Richard D. Schwartz United States
José Ramón Montero Gibert Spain
Michael J. Hogan United States
Lilliana Mason United States
Éric Bélanger Canada
Jonathan Rodden United States
Colin D. Flint United Kingdom
John C. Green relative to David E. Miller United Kingdom David E. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.7×
David E. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Green. The network helps show where John C. Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Green Line = papers co-authored together John C. Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995272
2 1997267
3 2010195
4 1994170
5 2005140
6 1999134
7 2003110
8 1989106
9 198394
10 201093
11 199489
12 200686
13 200566
14 201866
15 199365
16 200764
17 197861
18 198857
19 200656
20 200148

About John C. Green

John C. Green is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Geophysics and Health, having authored 98 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (43 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (28 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (28 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (21 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (11 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (10 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.7k citations), Health (408 citations), Communication (339 citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.0k citations) and Gender Studies (334 citations). John C. Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James L. Guth, Lyman A. Kellstedt, Corwin E. Smidt, Geoffrey C. Layman, David E. Campbell, Clyde Wilcox, Barry A. Kosmin, Robert D. Woodberry, Richard Herrera and Thomas M. Carsey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, PS Political Science & Politics, Political Research Quarterly, Political Behavior and American Journal of Political Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact