Dandan Ren

1.2k citations
47 papers · 978 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Dandan Ren

44 papers receiving 948 citations

Peers

Dandan Ren
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Aquatic Science 342
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 27
  • Biochemistry 51
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 111
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 19
Replace Yu. S. Khotimchenko with:
Yu. S. Khotimchenko Russia
Manoharan Vinosha India
Guangling Jiao Canada
Yixiang Liu China
Ekaterina D. Obluchinskaya Russia
Nancy P. Chandía Chile
Suresh Veeraperumal China
Limin Hao China
Siobhán Moane Ireland
Dandan Ren relative to Yu. S. Khotimchenko Russia Yu. S. Khotimchenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Yu. S. Khotimchenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dandan Ren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dandan Ren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dandan Ren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dandan Ren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dandan Ren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dandan Ren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dandan Ren. The network helps show where Dandan Ren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dandan Ren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dandan Ren Line = papers co-authored together Dandan Ren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201397
2 201454
3 201852
4 201952
5 201052
6 201551
7 200750
8 202350
9 201847
10 202242
11 201835
12 202235
13 201933
14 200732
15 201831
16 201830
17 200629
18 201724
19 202022
20 202315

About Dandan Ren

Dandan Ren is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Food Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 978 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (19 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (6 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (6 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (5 papers), Echinoderm biology and ecology (4 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (4 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers) and Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (342 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (27 citations), Biochemistry (51 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (111 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (19 citations). Dandan Ren has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yunhai He, Qiukuan Wang, Long Wu, Shu Liu, Yuefan Song, Shenghua Zhang, Hui Zhou, Haihua Cong, Xingju Yu and Wei Li. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Foods, Carbohydrate Polymers, Food Chemistry and Toxicology in Vitro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact