Dan Bertenthal
Impact in
- Molecular Medicine top 5%
- Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 1
- Health, psychology, and well-being 1
- Health 2
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy 2
- Co-authors
- John Peabody (3 shared papers)Kevin P. Bertrand (1 shared paper)Matthew L. Nilles (1 shared paper)Hiroshi Nikaido (1 shared paper)Jeff Luck (2 shared papers)E Rosenberg (1 shared paper)Peter Glassman (1 shared paper)Sharad Jain (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Molecular Microbiology (1 paper)Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (1 paper)Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)Contemporary Clinical Trials (1 paper)Medical Care (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
Dan Bertenthal
8 papers receiving 875 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Molecular Medicine 143
- Behavioral Neuroscience 78
- Biological Psychiatry 54
- Endocrinology 106
- Family Practice 22
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Bertenthal
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Bertenthal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Bertenthal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Bertenthal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Bertenthal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Bertenthal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Bertenthal. The network helps show where Dan Bertenthal may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Bertenthal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 321 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 207 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 185 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 92 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 79 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 |
About Dan Bertenthal
Dan Bertenthal is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Health Information Management, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 896 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Health, psychology, and well-being (1 paper), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1 paper) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (143 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (78 citations), Biological Psychiatry (54 citations), Endocrinology (106 citations) and Family Practice (22 citations). Dan Bertenthal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include John Peabody, Kevin P. Bertrand, Matthew L. Nilles, Hiroshi Nikaido, Jeff Luck, E Rosenberg, Peter Glassman, Sharad Jain, Karen H. Seal and Aoife O’Donovan. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Microbiology, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Biological Psychiatry, Contemporary Clinical Trials and Medical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.