Creina Mitchell

571 citations
22 papers · 411 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Creina Mitchell

21 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Creina Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Research and Theory 34
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
  • Emergency Medical Services 47
  • General Health Professions 133
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 150
Replace Winsome Lam with:
Winsome Lam Hong Kong
Barbara Carpio Canada
Marjaneh M. Fooladi Iran
Anna Nolte South Africa
Shelley Gower Australia
Elnora P. Mendias United States
Frances Rogan Australia
Jalal Safipour Sweden
Kuldip Bharj United Kingdom
Annie Temane South Africa
Creina Mitchell relative to Winsome Lam Hong Kong Winsome Lam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Winsome Lam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Creina Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Creina Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Creina Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Creina Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Creina Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Creina Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Creina Mitchell. The network helps show where Creina Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Creina Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Creina Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Creina Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201761
2 200460
3 200660
4 201547
5 200336
6 201131
7 201522
8 201814
9 201512
10 201511
11 199910
12 20248
13 20148
14 20196
15 20116
16 20196
17 20165
18
National Standards of Practice for Maternal Child and Family Health Nursing Practice in Australia
20175
19 20231
20 20211

About Creina Mitchell

Creina Mitchell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (34 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations), Emergency Medical Services (47 citations), General Health Professions (133 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (150 citations). Creina Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Judith Lumley, Letitia Del Fabbro, Marie‐Paule Austin, Stephanie Brown, Rhonda Small, Lyndsey Watson, Jane Gunn, Winsome St John, Anthony Welch and Moira Williamson. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice, BMC Public Health, Contemporary Nurse and Journal of Nursing Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact