Creina Mitchell

596 citations
24 papers · 438 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Creina Mitchell

22 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Creina Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Research and Theory 29
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 117
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 23
  • Emergency Medical Services 21
  • Health 23
Replace Bedriye Ak with:
Bedriye Ak Türkiye
Lesley Hewitt Australia
Barbara Carpio Canada
Winsome Lam Hong Kong
Elnora Prihoda Mendias United States
Jennieffer Barr Australia
Kathleen Duffy United Kingdom
Joanne Gray Australia
Joan H. Baldwin United States
Lufuno Makhado South Africa
Creina Mitchell relative to Bedriye Ak Türkiye Bedriye Ak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×
Bedriye Ak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Creina Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Creina Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Creina Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Creina Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Creina Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Creina Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Creina Mitchell. The network helps show where Creina Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Creina Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Creina Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Creina Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 200464
3 200658
4 201550
5 200335
6 201133
7 201524
8 202418
9 201814
10 201513
11 201512
12 199911
13 20148
14 20116
15 20196
16 20196
17 20165
18 20195
19 20211
20
Promoting family and child health
20111

About Creina Mitchell

Creina Mitchell is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 24 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (5 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (1 paper), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper), Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (29 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (117 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (23 citations), Emergency Medical Services (21 citations) and Health (23 citations). Creina Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Julie M. Shaw, Judith M Lumley, Letitia Del Fabbro, Marie‐Paule Austin, Winsome St John, Rhonda E Small, Lyndsey Watson, Jane Maree Gunn, Stephanie Brown and Anthony Welch. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice, BMC Public Health, Contemporary Nurse and Digital Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact