Anna Nolte

44 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Anna Nolte
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Research and Theory 20
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 9
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • General Health Professions 160
  • Clinical Psychology 113
Replace Annie M. Temane with:
Annie M. Temane South Africa
Anne Marit Lyberg Norway
Hatice Başkale Türkiye
Jennieffer Barr Australia
Mary Elaine Jones United States
Carmel Seibold Australia
Lisa S. Kelly United States
Charlené Downing South Africa
Yvonne Parry Australia
Lynne Porter Lewallen United States
Anna Nolte relative to Annie M. Temane South Africa Annie M. Temane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Annie M. Temane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Nolte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Nolte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Nolte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Nolte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Nolte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Nolte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Nolte. The network helps show where Anna Nolte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Anna Nolte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Nolte Line = papers co-authored together Anna Nolte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017197
2 201736
3 201827
4 201920
5 199819
6 200716
7 200814
8 202112
9 199411
10 201210
11 202110
12 20148
13
Traditional birth attendants in South Africa: professional midwives' beliefs and myths.
19988
14 20208
15 20188
16 20168
17 20107
18 20156
19 19925
20 20245

About Anna Nolte

Anna Nolte is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 48 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (5 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers) and African cultural and philosophical studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (20 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (9 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations), General Health Professions (160 citations) and Clinical Psychology (113 citations). Anna Nolte has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Eswatini. Frequent co-authors include Annie M. Temane, Marie Hastings‐Tolsma, Charlené Downing, Maria Sonto Maputle, Mary M. Chabeli, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, George Justus Hofmeyr, V. CHERYL NIKODEM, Wendy-Lynne Wolman and Marie Poggenpoel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Management, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Women and Birth and BMC Women s Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact