Corey Fee

854 citations
11 papers · 532 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Corey Fee

11 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Corey Fee
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Biological Psychiatry 215
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 185
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 242
  • Neurology 72
  • Developmental Neuroscience 29
Replace Laura Pérez-Caballero with:
Laura Pérez-Caballero Spain
Sonia Torres-Sánchez Spain
Thomas D. Prévot Canada
Emily Alway United States
Aileen M. Bailey United States
Lilian Canetti Canada
Jonathan Witztum United States
Adam Tripp United States
Reesha R. Patel United States
Levente Gellért Hungary
Corey Fee relative to Laura Pérez-Caballero Spain Laura Pérez-Caballero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Laura Pérez-Caballero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Corey Fee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Corey Fee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corey Fee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corey Fee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Corey Fee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Corey Fee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Corey Fee. The network helps show where Corey Fee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Corey Fee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Corey Fee Line = papers co-authored together Corey Fee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2017219
2 201789
3 201959
4 202034
5 202131
6 201930
7 201819
8 202118
9 201715
10 202113
11 20235

About Corey Fee

Corey Fee is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (215 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (185 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (242 citations), Neurology (72 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (29 citations). Corey Fee has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Etienne Sibille, Mounira Banasr, Keith A. Misquitta, Thomas D. Prévot, Ralph Dileone, Vanja Đurić, Ronald S. Duman, Ashley E. Lepack, Gerard Sanacora and Jaime G. Maldonado‐Avilés. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Neuropharmacology, Neuroscience, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact