Constance R. Schmidt

471 citations
23 papers · 359 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Constance R. Schmidt

21 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

Constance R. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 214
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 104
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 59
  • Gender Studies 36
  • Education 90
Replace Lorna Bourke with:
Lorna Bourke United Kingdom
Rosa Ana Clemente Spain
Jill K. Duthie United States
Ljubica Marjanovič‐Umek Slovenia
Angela Nyhout Canada
Brenda H. Manning United States
Aziza Mayo Netherlands
Josephine Roß United Kingdom
Akira Kobasigawa Canada
David B. Ryckman United States
Constance R. Schmidt relative to Lorna Bourke United Kingdom Lorna Bourke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Lorna Bourke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance R. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance R. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance R. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance R. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance R. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance R. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance R. Schmidt. The network helps show where Constance R. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Constance R. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance R. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Constance R. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198349
2 198733
3 198432
4 198430
5 199628
6 199624
7 197822
8 201520
9 197819
10 197918
11 198317
12 201615
13 197911
14 198810
15 20148
16 19887
17 19845
18 19865
19 20203
20 19861

About Constance R. Schmidt

Constance R. Schmidt is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education and Automotive Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (3 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (214 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (104 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (59 citations), Gender Studies (36 citations) and Education (90 citations). Constance R. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Scott G. Paris, Stephen R. Schmidt, Melissa K. Welch-Ross, Thomas H. Ollendick and Marilyn Shatz. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology, Memory, Memory & Cognition and Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact