Cody Ding

2.5k citations
122 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Cody Ding

115 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Cody Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 487
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 228
  • Clinical Psychology 254
  • Social Psychology 241
  • Leadership and Management 18
Replace Daniel Danner with:
Daniel Danner Germany
Edward Nȩcka Poland
Lei Mo China
Andreu Vigil‐Colet Spain
Erin Michelle Buchanan United States
Jamie Lynn Taxer United States
Ana María Pérez García Spain
David Gallardo‐Pujol Spain
Hyemin Han United States
A. Susan M. Niessen Netherlands
Cody Ding relative to Daniel Danner Germany Daniel Danner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Daniel Danner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cody Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cody Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cody Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cody Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cody Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cody Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cody Ding. The network helps show where Cody Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cody Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cody Ding Line = papers co-authored together Cody Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 122 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013112
2 201390
3 200257
4 201256
5 201352
6 200750
7 201143
8 201843
9 201142
10 201839
11
Teaching Effectiveness and Student Achievement: Examining the Relationship
200635
12 201835
13 200634
14 200634
15 201434
16 201433
17 202032
18 201630
19 201129
20 201428

About Cody Ding

Cody Ding is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Management Science and Operations Research, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 122 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (24 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (22 papers), Statistical Methods and Applications (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), School Choice and Performance (5 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (5 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (487 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (228 citations), Clinical Psychology (254 citations), Social Psychology (241 citations) and Leadership and Management (18 citations). Cody Ding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Senqing Qi, Dong Yang, Hong Li, Qinghong Zeng, Ling‐Xiang Xia, Scott L. Hershberger, Alice E. Hall, Mark L. Davison, Steven D. Hollon and Jiang Qiu. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences, Practical assessment, research & evaluation and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact