Daniel Danner

55 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Daniel Danner
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Applied Psychology 207
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 545
  • Social Psychology 584
  • Clinical Psychology 524
  • Periodontics 74
Replace Sara Lindberg with:
Sara Lindberg United States
Steven V. Rouse United States
Alastair McClelland United Kingdom
Eva Traut‐Mattausch Austria
Christoph J. Kemper Luxembourg
Yiwei Chen United States
Andreu Vigil‐Colet Spain
Michael R. Maniaci United States
Rodica Ioana Damian United States
Lorraine D. Eyde United States
Daniel Danner relative to Sara Lindberg United States Sara Lindberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Sara Lindberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Danner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Danner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Danner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Danner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Danner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Danner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Danner. The network helps show where Daniel Danner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Danner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Danner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Danner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008225
2 2018129
3 2019111
4 201588
5 201681
6 201676
7 201574
8 201665
9 201063
10 201861
11 201659
12 201157
13 201757
14 201256
15 201046
16 201741
17 201036
18 202035
19 202035
20 201934

About Daniel Danner

Daniel Danner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (16 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (12 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (7 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (207 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (545 citations), Social Psychology (584 citations), Clinical Psychology (524 citations) and Periodontics (74 citations). Daniel Danner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Beatrice Rammstedt, Clemens M. Lechner, Klaus Fiedler, Oliver P. John, Christopher J. Soto, Dirk Hagemann, Christian Unkelbach, Alexander J. Hassel, Julian Aichholzer and Andrea Schankin. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Journal of Research in Personality, Personality and Individual Differences, Zeitschrift für Psychologie and Journal of Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact