Daniel Danner

2.6k citations
53 papers · 1.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Danner

51 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Daniel Danner
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 549
  • Applied Psychology 208
  • Social Psychology 581
  • Clinical Psychology 522
  • Periodontics 88
Replace Hallgeir Halvari with:
Hallgeir Halvari Norway
Danielle N. Shapiro United States
Sara Lindberg United States
Gillian Yeo Australia
James F. Hemphill Canada
Jesús M. Alvarado Spain
Alastair McClelland United Kingdom
Steven V. Rouse United States
Glenn S. Sanders United States
Robert M. Thorndike United States
Daniel Danner relative to Hallgeir Halvari Norway Hallgeir Halvari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Hallgeir Halvari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Danner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Danner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Danner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Danner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Danner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Danner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Danner. The network helps show where Daniel Danner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Danner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Danner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Danner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008214
2 2018124
3 2019100
4 201583
5 201673
6 201571
7 201671
8 201860
9 201757
10 201657
11 201657
12 201055
13 201252
14 201151
15 201046
16 201737
17 201035
18 202033
19 201933
20 202032

About Daniel Danner

Daniel Danner is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (16 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (13 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (7 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (549 citations), Applied Psychology (208 citations), Social Psychology (581 citations), Clinical Psychology (522 citations) and Periodontics (88 citations). Daniel Danner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Beatrice Rammstedt, Clemens M. Lechner, Klaus Fiedler, Christopher J. Soto, Oliver P. John, Dirk Hagemann, Christian Unkelbach, Alexander J. Hassel, Julian Aichholzer and Andrea Schankin. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Journal of Research in Personality, Personality and Individual Differences, Zeitschrift für Psychologie and Clinical Oral Investigations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact