Christopher T. Fields

14 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Christopher T. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 78
  • Biological Psychiatry 50
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 153
  • Social Psychology 84
  • Developmental Neuroscience 14
Replace Daniel Peterlik with:
Daniel Peterlik Germany
Alexandra Estela Soto Piña Mexico
Nicholas J. Jury United States
Ying Sze United Kingdom
Oleg Yu. Sokolov Russia
Hui‐Chun Li China
Gwen S. Stinnett United States
Carine Dournes Germany
Jennifer R. Rainville United States
Chantelle Ferland‐Beckham United States
Christopher T. Fields relative to Daniel Peterlik Germany Daniel Peterlik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Daniel Peterlik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher T. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher T. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher T. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher T. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher T. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher T. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher T. Fields. The network helps show where Christopher T. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher T. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher T. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Christopher T. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2002148
2 201965
3 200362
4 201831
5 201729
6 201424
7 201816
8 201415
9 20248
10 20247
11 20224
12 20252
13 20251
14 20251
15 20250
16 20250

About Christopher T. Fields

Christopher T. Fields is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Social Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers), Gut microbiota and health (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (78 citations), Biological Psychiatry (50 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (153 citations), Social Psychology (84 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (14 citations). Christopher T. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Geert J. De Vries, Lawrence N. Eisenman, Charles F. Zorumski, Steven J. Mennerick, Benoît Chassaing, Andrew T. Gewirtz, Matthew J. Paul, Joe Henry Steinbach, Ann M. Benz and Tao Fu. Their work appears in journals such as Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, Journal of Neuroscience, The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, The Journal of Physiology and Teaching and Learning in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact